What is a potential limitation of using fences as evidence in boundary disputes?

The option stating that fences do not show the intent of original property boundaries is a significant limitation when using fences as evidence in boundary disputes. Fences are often built based on a variety of circumstances, including personal preferences or pragmatic reasons, rather than precise boundary definitions set forth in legal documents.

In many cases, property owners may construct fences without a clear understanding of their exact property lines, leading to discrepancies between the physical barrier and the legally defined boundaries. Thus, while fences can serve as a visual marker of where one believes their property ends, they don't necessarily reflect the historical intent of property boundaries established by deeds or surveys. This lack of alignment with original intent can complicate legal disputes when parties rely on fences as definitive evidence of ownership.

Overall, because fences can be built in ways that do not correspond to legal property lines or definitions, using them as sole evidence in boundary disputes may lead to misunderstandings and disputes over the actual properties.