What is generally assumed about a written conveyance regarding its intended terms?

The assumption that a written conveyance contains all intended terms stems from the principle of completeness in legal documents. When a written conveyance is created, it is generally presumed that the parties involved have understood and agreed upon all aspects of the transaction, which are then reflected in that document. This means that not only the explicit terms laid out in the text but also any implied agreements or understandings related to the transaction are considered to be included.

This presumption is important because it helps ensure that the document serves as a comprehensive record of the agreement. It also upholds the reliability of written contracts, as parties rely on the content of these documents to define their rights and obligations without needing to consider any omitted or unexpressed terms.

In contrast, the other choices present misunderstandings about the nature of written conveyances. For example, stating that a conveyance contains only explicit terms overlooks the broader legal framework that supports the inclusion of implied terms. Additionally, while a conveyance does not require verification by a legal authority, this can vary based on jurisdiction, and the option regarding modification ignores the fact that many written instruments can indeed be amended by mutual consent.